Is L'Oréal more reliable than the French government? Sell-off of French government bonds causes an inversion phenomenon, with yields of nearly 40% of high-rated corporate bonds lower than those of sovereign bonds.
Amid the sell-off of French government bonds, 215 billion euros worth of corporate bonds now yield less than government bonds, with the scale increasing 18 times this year as investors turn to high-quality corporate debt for risk aversion.
Zhituo Finance APP has noted that after a brutal sell-off of government bonds, nearly €215 billion (about $241 billion) worth of French corporate bonds are now trading at prices below those of government bonds with the same term—meaning they are considered safer than government bonds. This scale has grown nearly 18 times since early 2026.
According to compiled data, about 38% of the total high-grade French corporate bonds yielded lower than government bonds of the same maturity as of Wednesday. At the beginning of the year, this figure was just €12 billion.
This phenomenon, which upends the traditional market hierarchy, is not entirely new, but it has escalated rapidly in France. Market concerns are focused on the missed deficit targets, the deadlock over the new budget, and the looming presidential election, which could steer France in a vastly different direction.
As confidence in government bonds has eroded, corporate bonds—especially those from companies with significant international business like L'Oréal and oil and gas giant TotalEnergies—have now become among the safest havens.

In France, corporate debt is increasingly becoming a safe asset
Elisa Belgacem, senior credit strategist at Generali Investments, said, “France’s sovereign story and the corporate credit story have become increasingly disconnected.” Corporates and banks “continue to enjoy strong investor demand, highlighting market confidence in issuers’ fundamentals and the appeal of total yields.”
Paris-based Air Liquide is the latest example. On Tuesday, this industrial gas manufacturer issued €2 billion in bonds, attracting around €12.5 billion in investor orders, with both fixed-rate tranches yielding below those of French government bonds.
For Edward Farley, head of European investment grade corporate bonds at PGIM, the key factor is where companies’ revenues originate. Take L'Oréal and LVMH as examples: “Aside from being registered in France, the French factor is pretty much the only influence on them,” he said.
However, Farley is more cautious on French banks, as they are more closely linked to the government bond market. Whether by directly holding sovereign debt or being indirectly exposed to economic policy through lending, banks are intimately connected to national risk. The cost of default insurance for French bank bonds has now soared above that of other European peers.
Extreme Cases
Although France is an extreme case of corporate bond yields inverting with government bond yields, this dynamic has been brewing among developed economies for some time.
Traditionally, sovereign debt serves as the benchmark for bond market safety, because governments can increase taxes if they run short of funds. But as deficits swell and politicians across the spectrum struggle to rein them in, companies with strong balance sheets and strict financial discipline have instead become better bets.
Last year, Microsoft briefly saw its bond trading costs dip below those of US Treasuries, as markets worried about the fiscal impact of US tax cuts. Even earlier, during the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis, some Spanish and Italian corporate bonds were cheaper than their respective countries’ government debt—a situation more commonly faced by emerging market investors.
In France, since President Macron announced a snap election after his defeat in the European Parliament elections in mid-2024, political uncertainty has been a persistent theme in the bond market. By the end of that year, a few companies' bond yields had already fallen below those of French government bonds (OATs).
But this phenomenon is now much more widespread, and the scale of the corporate bond yield inversion may continue to grow. With more than six months to go until the French presidential election, the sell-off in government bonds has already begun to spill over to other markets.
Barclays credit strategist Melissa McCallum observed that the typical scenario of the domestic government bond yield curve acting as a floor for the credit market “may fail during periods of sovereign stress.”
“But it’s notable that it’s not just high-grade corporate bonds breaking through the OAT curve; many BBB-rated bonds have also narrowed their spreads below it,” she said.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Morgan Stanley senior bond investor turns bullish on US Treasuries for the first time in ten years
US Stock Movement | SuperX AI Technology (SUPX.US) once fell more than 2.5%, hitting an intraday low of $6.46
SuperX AI Technology's stock price declined, falling more than 2.5% at one point.
BUZZ-Pacira BioSciences participated in a Viatris acquisition deal worth 1.65 billions dollars
Latest Update October 8 – Pacira BioSciences (PCRX.O) shares surged by 44%, hitting a more than three-year high at $36.30. If the rally holds, PCRX is poised for its largest single-day gain on record. Pharmaceutical company Viatris (VTRS.O) will acquire Pacira BioSciences in a $1.65 billion cash deal, offering $36.50 per share. The offer represents a premium of approximately 44.8% over Pacira’s recent closing price of $25.20. The transaction will add Pacira’s non-opioid pain medications Exparel and Zilretta to Viatris' product portfolio. Viatris shares fell 2.6% to $17.04. JPMorgan stated: “We believe this acquisition will not significantly alter VTRS' overall financial profile in the short or long term, and expect Exparel’s sales to gradually decline post-2030 due to generic market entry.” Both parties expect to complete the transaction by the end of 2026. Including intraday fluctuations, PCRX shares have risen 40.2% year-to-date, while VTRS has gained 36.8%. (For the convenience of non-English speakers, Reuters provides automated translations of its reports into several other languages. As automated translation may contain errors or lack the necessary context, Reuters does not guarantee the accuracy of automated translated texts and provides them for readers’ convenience only. Reuters assumes no liability for any damage or losses resulting from the use of automated translation.)
Updated Version 3 - According to the Financial Times, Starbucks once considered acquiring Chipotle
New charts have been added, providing a detailed overview of Chipotle and Starbucks’ businesses. According to Reuters on October 8, referencing the Financial Times from Thursday, Starbucks had considered acquiring Chipotle Mexican Grill. Such a move would enable CEO Brian Niccol to return to the burrito chain, where he served as chief executive before joining Starbucks two years ago. The Financial Times, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the coffee chain has been working with advisers in recent months to formulate an acquisition proposal for Chipotle. Both Starbucks and Chipotle did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comment. Chipotle currently has a market capitalization close to $39 billions, with its stock rising about 6% on Thursday, while Starbucks’ shares fell approximately 3%. According to data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), Starbucks is valued at about $107 billions. As consumers cut back on discretionary spending, Chipotle has faced declining customer traffic, while rising food and labor costs have pressured profit margins across the sector. Its stock price has dropped about 17% so far this year. Analysts suggest that a potential deal could also accelerate Chipotle’s international expansion. “I see the appeal of this prospective transaction in that CEO Brian Niccol would have the opportunity to leverage Starbucks' European franchise partnerships to pursue Chipotle’s growth more aggressively,” commented Jim Sanderson, an analyst at Northcoast Research. As of the end of last year, Chipotle operated nearly 4,000 restaurants in the US and about 100 abroad. In comparison, Starbucks has about 40,000 stores globally, with roughly 18,000 in North America. Niccol joined Starbucks in 2024 after six years at Chipotle, where he was credited with leading the company’s turnaround following a food safety crisis and with driving several years of strong digital sales growth. He was brought to Starbucks to reverse its declining performance, and over the past two years has focused on improving the customer experience by streamlining menus and reducing wait times, resulting in four consecutive quarters of comparable sales growth. “We still have more work to do,” Niccol said in July, after the company raised its annual sales and profit forecast. “Given that Starbucks is in a period of transformation and has yet to deliver the margin improvements investors expect, the timing of this decision seems somewhat strange. At first glance, it appears to be less about accelerating transformation and more about running out of options,” said Brian Jacobsen, Chief Economist at Annex Wealth Management.
