Meta and Microsoft strive to reduce employees’ reliance on Claude: Meta’s internal usage has halved, and Microsoft has cut its budget by one-third.
Microsoft's internal Claude budget has been reduced by more than one-third from its peak, and the number of internal Claude Code users at Meta has dropped from around 60,000 to 30,000. Both companies emphasize that external customer demand is still growing, but the decline in internal usage puts pressure on Anthropic. According to Anthropic's IPO prospectus, two major clients together contributed about 25% of its revenue. Although the prospectus does not name specific clients, it is highly likely that Meta and Microsoft are these two clients or among them.
Meta and Microsoft are working to reduce employees’ use of Claude, putting pressure on Anthropic’s revenue outlook.
On October 5th, according to The Information, Meta and Microsoft are drastically cutting internal use of Anthropic’s Claude AI in favor of promoting their own in-house tools among staff.
This shift directly impacts the core revenue structure of Anthropic. In its recent IPO prospectus, the company disclosed that these two major customers together contribute around 25% of its revenue.
Microsoft previously projected its annual internal spending on Claude to be at least $1 billion, but this budget has already been reduced by more than one-third. Meanwhile, the number of Meta employees using Claude Code internally has plummeted from about 60,000 earlier this year to around 30,000—a drop of nearly 50%.
This adjustment is of great significance for Anthropic. While both tech giants have emphasized that external enterprise customers’ use of Claude remains on the rise, the shrinking internal usage signals that major technology companies are accelerating the move to bring AI capabilities in-house.
Microsoft: Cutting Internal Claude Budget, Shifting to In-House Models
The core logic behind Microsoft’s move is to control operating costs.
According to reports citing informed sources, Microsoft began reducing its dependence on Claude Code as early as May this year, aiming to limit employees’ token consumption and promote the adoption of its own internal models.
Microsoft had previously estimated internal use of Claude AI would reach $1 billion in spending, but after instructing employees to cut back on Claude to save costs and spend more time on Microsoft’s proprietary AI tools, this budget has been reduced by over one-third.
It is noteworthy that this adjustment is limited to internal operations; Anthropic model services offered to external clients via the Microsoft enterprise platform are continuing to grow steadily.
Meta: In-House Tools Accelerate, Substitution Effects Emerge
The drop in Meta’s internal usage of Claude is due to both personnel changes and strategic intentions.
This spring, Meta laid off around 10% of its 78,000 employees, which helped lower the baseline of Claude usage. However, reports indicate that the deeper driver is the rapid maturation of Meta’s own AI ecosystem.
Meta has launched two internal programming assistant tools: MetaCode, which is for internal use only and now has over 30,000 users; and Muse Code, which began external client testing in August, with internal users now exceeding 6,000.
Muse Code is seen as a direct competitor to Claude Code, built on Meta’s proprietary models and is part of the Muse Spark series product line.
Despite a sharp decline in the number of Claude Code users, Meta’s spending on Claude Code in just the past 28 days has still exceeded $105 million.
Anthropic: Customer Concentration Risk Raises Concerns
In its recent IPO prospectus, Anthropic disclosed that two customers together contributed about 25% of its revenue, without naming specific clients. The market widely believes that Meta and Microsoft are likely these two customers or at least one of them.
Both key customers are simultaneously reducing internal usage, and the rapid rise of in-house alternative tools has left Anthropic facing the structural risk of overreliance on key clients during this critical IPO window.
Although external enterprise demand is still growing, whether it can compensate for the revenue lost from shrinking internal usage remains an uncertainty closely watched by investors.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Brent crude oil futures main contract surpasses $101 per barrel, up 0.71% intraday.
Brent crude oil futures main contract has just surpassed the $101.00 per barrel mark, now quoted at $101.01 per barrel, up 0.71% on the day.
Spot gold breaks through the $4,170 per ounce threshold
Spot gold has just surpassed the $4,170.00 per ounce mark, currently quoted at $4,169.81 per ounce, up 0.71% on the day; the main COMEX gold futures contract is now at $4,198.10 per ounce, up 0.99% on the day.
Brent crude oil surpasses $101 per barrel, up 0.68% intraday
Brent crude oil prices surpassed the $101 per barrel mark, with an intraday increase of 0.68%. As one of the key benchmarks for international crude oil pricing, fluctuations in Brent prices often trigger a chain reaction in global energy markets, transportation costs, and inflation levels in various countries. This price increase has attracted widespread attention from energy industry professionals and market participants worldwide.
International oil prices rose slightly on October 6, New York crude closed at $89.44
International oil prices saw a slight increase on October 6. By the close of trading, the price of light crude oil futures for November delivery on the New York Mercantile Exchange edged up by $0.01, settling at $89.44 per barrel, a gain of 0.01%. Brent crude oil futures for December delivery in London rose by $0.26 to close at $100.58 per barrel, an increase of 0.26%. In recent times, international oil prices have remained volatile. Multiple supply and demand factors continue to support oil prices: on one hand, production cuts by oil-producing countries are tightening market supply; on the other hand, fluctuations in expectations for global economic recovery create uncertainty on the demand side for crude oil. The future path of oil prices will continue to be influenced jointly by geopolitical developments, major economies' energy policies, and other factors.
