Bitget App
Trade smarter
Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnAISquareMore
Can XPL break $0.105 after Plasma’s product launch fails to lift price?

Can XPL break $0.105 after Plasma’s product launch fails to lift price?

AMBCryptoAMBCrypto2026/07/01 10:01
By:AMBCrypto

Plasma [XPL] declined by 11.58% over the past 24 hours despite the successful rollout of Plasma One’s neobank and Visa card on the 30th of June. The token traded at $0.09009 at press time while its market capitalization stood at $162.16 million. 

However, trading activity remained elevated as daily volume climbed 13.42% to $115.9 million. The sharp increase in volume suggested that market participants stayed highly active even as the token lost value. 

Rather than attracting sustained buying interest, the product launch coincided with renewed selling pressure.

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="bsa-zone_1774359638628-7_123456"] { min-height: 50px; transition: min-height 0.3s ease; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 640px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^="bsa-zone_1774359638628-7_123456"] { min-height: 90px; } }
AD

Why are top traders still betting lower on XPL?

Binance’s top trader Long/Short Ratio continued reflecting a cautious outlook despite the product launch. 

At the time of writing, longs represented 47.51% of positions, while shorts made up 52.49%. This left the Long/Short Ratio at 0.91, showing that professional traders maintained a modest bearish bias throughout the latest session. 

Although the imbalance remained relatively small, it still indicated that experienced participants preferred downside exposure instead of positioning for an immediate recovery. However, the gap between long and short positions did not widen aggressively, suggesting that traders had avoided taking extreme directional bets. 

Instead, sentiment remained defensive as participants waited for stronger confirmation before changing their positioning.

Source: CoinGlass

Leveraged bulls absorbed most liquidation losses

Liquidation data also reflected the pressure that long traders experienced during the decline. Total long liquidations reached $222.66K across major exchanges, while short liquidations totaled only $83.53K. 

Binance recorded the largest long liquidation value at $87.96K, followed by Hyperliquid with $104.6K. By comparison, Binance registered just $19.43K in short liquidations during the same period. 

Several other exchanges displayed a similar pattern, reinforcing that leveraged bulls absorbed significantly larger losses than bearish traders. Even though short liquidations remained present across the market, they failed to match the scale of forced long closures. 

Therefore, recent price weakness affected bullish positions much more heavily than bearish exposure.

Source: CoinGlass

Can XPL reclaim its neckline resistance?

XPL continued holding above the critical $0.085 support, keeping its inverse head-and-shoulders pattern intact despite recent weakness. 

Buyers repeatedly defended the right shoulder, although they failed to secure a decisive close above the $0.1058 neckline, where selling pressure continued limiting upside attempts. Meanwhile, the RSI stood at 50.54 as of writing, while its signal line remained at 53.81, showing that buying strength had cooled but stayed close to neutral instead of turning outright bearish. 

If bulls reclaim the neckline with stronger participation, the reversal pattern would confirm and open the path toward $0.120, followed by the measured target near $0.150. However, another rejection below $0.1058 would likely keep XPL consolidating above $0.085 until buyers generate enough demand to force a sustained breakout.

Source: TradingView

Conclusively, XPL remained under pressure despite its major product launch, while derivatives traders continued favoring short positions, and long liquidations dominated recent market activity. However, price still held above key support and preserved the inverse head-and-shoulders structure. 

If buyers reclaim the $0.105 neckline, the bullish pattern would remain valid. Otherwise, continued resistance would likely keep XPL trading below its breakout level.

Final Summary

  • Plasma XPL remained under pressure despite its product launch as bearish positioning persisted.
  • Buyers defended key support, but resistance near $0.105 continued limiting upside progress.

 

0
0

Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.

Understand the market, then trade.
Bitget offers one-stop trading for cryptocurrencies, stocks, and gold.
Trade now!

You may also like

US Treasury "Extreme Short Sellers" Gather! With Oil Prices and Treasury Yields "Dual Pressure," Rate Hike Expectations Surge, Market Bets Real Money on a New Round of Tightening

According to some veteran Wall Street analysts, the most favorable combination for the market is a small rate hike accompanied by a clear data-dependent stance, allowing investors to interpret it as a limited and moderate monetary policy adjustment to guard against recurring inflation.

智通财经2026/09/16 03:21
US Treasury "Extreme Short Sellers" Gather! With Oil Prices and Treasury Yields "Dual Pressure," Rate Hike Expectations Surge, Market Bets Real Money on a New Round of Tightening

Intel CEO: CPU only meets 50% of demand, 14A to start production in Q1 next year, new architecture may reduce inference power consumption to 1/15 of GPU

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger stated that the era of AI agents has triggered an explosion in CPU demand, and Intel is currently able to meet only about 50% of its customers' supply needs, with several tech giant CEOs calling to secure supply. In terms of manufacturing process, the 18A node is now in full mass production, while the 14A node will begin production in the first quarter of next year. By opening up factory data, yield rates are improving by about 7% annually. Additionally, he is advancing neuromorphic computing to address energy consumption bottlenecks and expects quantum computing to have a substantial industrial impact within 3 to 5 years.

华尔街见闻2026/09/16 02:31