Oil: Futures discount tightening physical market – ING
ING’s Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey note that Oil prices are drifting lower as markets price in a possible extension of the US–Iran ceasefire and renewed peace talks, even as physical supply tightens due to disrupted flows through the Strait of Hormuz. They highlight record US Oil and refined product exports, limited US drilling response, and a growing divergence between Brent futures and the physical market.
Physical tightness contrasts with softer futures
"The oil market continues to edge lower amid hopes that the US and Iran extend their ceasefire by another 2 weeks, along with a potential resumption in talks to bring an end to the war. However, the physical market is becoming tighter every day that passes without a restart of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz."
"After taking into consideration pipeline diversions and the trickle of tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, we estimate that roughly 13m b/d has been disrupted. But with the US blockade, this number could creep higher."
"The divergence between the futures and physical markets is clear: dated Brent traded around $117/bbl, while front-month Brent futures settled a little below $95/bbl yesterday. The key upside risk for the market is that peace talks between the US and Iran break down."
"With buyers shifting toward US barrels, the domestic market is set to tighten as long as Middle East disruptions persist, likely prompting a supply response from US producers. US drilling activity, however, has barely moved since the start of the conflict."
"The lack of drilling activity also ties in with the EIA’s domestic crude oil production forecasts, which suggest little change in output this year. If we see a pickup in US drilling activity, it would have a more meaningful impact on oil output over 2027."
(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The Federal Reserve holds rates steady as expected, with divisions resurfacing but fewer hawkish voices; Cook and two other voting members support a rate hike.
After three dissenting votes in July, there was once again division in this rate decision, with two of the 12 FOMC members opposed, indicating a decrease in hawkish dissent. Among the dissenters, Harker had already voted against holding rates steady in July due to his support for a rate hike, while Cook’s dissent is seen as a rebuke to Trump’s attempt to remove her. This statement changed the description of the economy from “steadily expanding” to “strong expansion,” continued to emphasize that inflation remains high, and newly added that accumulating information will help determine the policy stance needed to ensure inflation returns to target in a timely manner. According to the “New Fed News Agency,” the Fed’s decision to hold rates steady aims to gain time to assess whether further rate hikes are necessary.
A16z’s crypto predictions aged like milk

