The US-Israel-Iran war breaks the "historical script"; Deutsche Bank: US stock market deviates from past patterns, CTA funds may continue to reduce holdings
Odaily Finance has learned that, against the backdrop of the ongoing escalation of the US-Israel-Iran war, global markets are gradually deviating from the "historical script." A month ago, at the outbreak of the war, many institutional investors generally expected this geopolitical event to end swiftly and bet that the stock market would recover in the short term.
This judgment was mainly based on historical experience. Statistics from Deutsche Bank's strategy team show that, in past geopolitical shocks, the S&P 500 Index typically took about 16 trading days to bottom out and then completed a recovery in around 109 days. However, this average is significantly influenced by the extreme case following the 1973 Arab oil embargo, when the S&P 500 took more than five and a half years to fully recover its losses.
So far, market trends have started to diverge from this pattern. Last Friday marked the 20th trading day since the outbreak of the conflict. Since the market close on February 27, the S&P 500 index has dropped about 7.4%, already exceeding the historical average decline of 6.1% seen after previous geopolitical conflicts, indicating a more profound impact this time.
Although there was a "buy the dip" rebound in early Monday trading after US President Trump released signals of negotiation progress, the rally failed to sustain, indicating that investor confidence remains fragile.
From a liquidity perspective, institutional investors have clearly reduced their risk exposure. According to Deutsche Bank, active investors currently hold underweight positions in stocks, but there is still room for further reduction. Meanwhile, systematic strategy funds, including CTAs, have lowered their stock allocations to under neutral levels for the first time since July. If there is no rebound or if volatility rises further, such funds may continue to cut positions.
Market sentiment indicators also reflect rising anxiety. The S&P 500 Volatility Index (commonly known as the "fear index" VIX) closed above 30 on Monday, a level that is usually seen as a sign the market is on high alert.
As for index performance, on Monday, the S&P 500 index fell by 0.39% (UTC+8), the Nasdaq dropped by 0.73% (UTC+8), while the Dow Jones saw a modest increase of 0.11% (UTC+8).
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Quarterly Revenue Hits 16.8 Billion for IPO Push—Can Anthropic’s Profits Support a $2 Trillion Valuation?
Anthropic disclosed Q3 revenue of $16.8 billion and achieved adjusted profitability. Compared to OpenAI's expectations and projected massive losses in 2025, the analysis covers Anthropic's enterprise growth logic, competitive landscape, and the rationality of its $2 trillion valuation.
"Bullish" Burry Issues Another Warning for US Stocks: If the "Magnificent Seven" Join the Drop and Bond Yields Fall, Wall Street May Face a "Bloody October"
Burry warns that the painful trading in the market may continue. He proposes a bearish "Red October" scenario: if the "Magnificent Seven" U.S. tech stocks follow semiconductor stocks in a decline, and bond yields simultaneously fall, his conviction in this scenario will become even stronger.

Tesla (TSLA.US) to Host Roadster Launch Event This Friday: Elon Musk Promises "Greatest Product Demo Ever," Debut of the Nine-Year-Teased "Flying Sports Car"
On the eve of the Roadster launch event, Elon Musk promised to deliver "the greatest product demonstration in history."

Tech Stocks Plunge, Safe-Haven U.S. Treasury Trades Return? 10-Year U.S. Treasury Yield Drops to Three-Week Low
If AI capital expenditure slows down, a sudden halt in computing power construction will severely impact the supply chain while lowering market expectations for demand in electricity, commodities, and high-end hardware. This not only leads to a correction of overvalued assets, but also undermines growth expectations and inflation premiums, ultimately benefiting bonds. This logic is highly similar to the macroeconomic landscape during the bursting of the internet bubble in 2000, when the Nasdaq collapsed and the yield on 10-year US Treasury bonds dropped from a high of 6.5% to the 4% range.
