Bitcoin Blunder: Somebody Just Lost $170,000 In BTC Transaction Fee
A Bitcoin user tried to consolidate his UTXOs, but made a very costly mistake.
A lucky Bitcoin miner just enjoyed another splash of profits thanks to an abnormally high fee paid by one of the network’s users.
Blockchain data shows that an unknown user paid 4 BTC ($172,000) in a transaction fee on Tuesday, dwarfing the amount actually needed to process the transfer.
A Costly Blockchain Mistake
According to mempool.space , the transaction itself only sent 2.9 BTC to the intended recipient, meaning the attached fee was over 133% the size of the transaction itself.
By the site’s metrics, the transaction was overpaid by a factor of 29,992x. Specifically, the user paid 1,800,890 satoshis per vByte (sat/vB) – a metric for calculating demand for Bitcoin block space at a given time. For that block, the standard transaction only paid roughly 60 sat/vB.
“When you’re consolidating UTXOs make sure to actually consolidate them instead of turning one into a fee,” said Tomer Strolight, editor-in-chief for Swan Bitcoin, regarding the transaction in a post to X.
UTXO stands for Unspent Transaction Output, meaning an individual BTC transfer sitting separately within a user’s Bitcoin wallet. These transfers can be thought of as chunks of bitcoin that the user controls: some chunks are larger than others (comprising more BTC) and all of the chunks put together make up the user’s wallet balance.
Generally speaking, its best to avoid dividing one’s BTC into several small UTXOs – especially for economic reasons. When sending large amounts of BTC later, the user must pay a fee on every single UTXO that moves, meaning the more there are, the more expensive the transaction will be.
On-chain data suggests that the high-paying user was attempting to consolidate his UTXOs to avoid this problem – a technique for merging several smaller outputs into a larger one. Days earlier, the same user had received two Bitcoin transactions worth 2.9 BTC and 4.03 BTC each – the same values as his Tuesday transfer and fee respectively.
Will The User Get His Bitcoin Back?
Though Bitcoin transactions and fees are technically irreversible, overpaid transfers have often been paid back by the miners who receive them.
For example, in September, Bitcoin mining pool F2Pool returned funds to Paxos after the latter accidentally paid $500,000 for a Bitcoin transaction.
Months later, mining pool giant Antpool reimbursed an anonymous user’s record-shattering $3.1 million fee to miners.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
The US market narrative undergoes a "dramatic reversal": shifting from "AI-driven deflation and controllable US debt" to "AI squeezing the bond market, and Bassen unable to control long-term interest rates"
Deutsche Bank points out that the market narrative regarding the U.S. economy has shifted from "AI drives down inflation" to "AI-related bond issuance pushes up U.S. Treasury yields," but pessimism may be overdone. The bank believes that the real risks underestimated by the market are security incidents in the AI ecosystem, failed IPOs, or underwhelming revenues, which could undermine the dollar and support the bond market. In addition, France's fiscal difficulties are putting new pressure on the euro.
Deutsche Bank: The "fifth wave of tech stock rally" in US stocks since late July has peaked, prepare for a "V-shaped reversal"
Deutsche Bank has downgraded its rating on US technology stocks from overweight to neutral, noting that the fifth round of tech stock rally since July 29 is approaching the upper boundary of the long-term trend channel. The current upside potential is only about 4 percentage points, while historical trends indicate downside risks could reach 16 percentage points. Funds are expected to rotate into other sectors, and the European market, with its lower tech exposure, is likely to benefit relatively. However, Deutsche Bank emphasized that the long-term outperformance trend of technology stocks remains unchanged.
How expensive is AI computing power rental in the US? "Spot price" is twice that of long-term contracts, and four times the return threshold for cloud service providers.
The short-term spot leasing price for AI computing power reaches as high as $40 to $50 billion per gigawatt per year, while the price for long-term contracts is only $20 billion per year, and the breakeven threshold for supercomputing cloud operators is around $12 billion per year. However, according to Goldman Sachs, the fundamental reason why hyperscale cloud providers like Google rent computing power at such significant premiums is that their in-house capacity cannot keep up; once their own capacity catches up, the spot premium will disappear.
Crypto prices
More
