The launch of the spot bitcoin ETF is just the beginning
Quick Take The Block’s Frank Chaparro gives his opinion on last week’s spot bitcoin ETF approvals. This first appeared in Chaparro’s biweekly The Scoop Newsletter on Jan. 12. Sign up now.
The debut of the new funds was met with much fanfare and liquidity, with day two of trading seeing $3.1 billion in trading volumes, as noted by my colleague RT Watson.
Among issuers of new spot bitcoin funds, BlackRock led the way with $564 million traded on Friday, while Fidelity saw $431 million of volume. That's according to data from Yahoo Finance compiled by The Block.
Liquidity during these early days is likely to be welcomed by issuers and market participants, adding further fuel to this significant milestone in the maturation of the asset class and gaining acceptance among Wall Street giants.
Advocates for this financial instrument have anticipated that it could replicate the impact of the first gold spot ETF on the precious metal, opening Bitcoin BTC -6.94% to a broader investor base and causing its price to surge.
However, it's crucial to recognize that this change will unfold gradually. While the ETF represents a pivotal step, it's advised not to overly fixate on flows and volumes in these initial stages, given the deliberate – some might say painstakingly slow — pace of Wall Street.
The saying "if you build it, they will come" holds true, but it will require time.
Consider the fact that various market participants, notably Vanguard, currently prohibit their clients from purchasing spot Bitcoin ETFs on their platforms. Vanguard, being the world's largest retirement plan provider, exemplifies the cautious approach adopted by major players in the industry. Meanwhile, firms like UBS and Citi only plan to allow "some" customers to trade bitcoin ETFs, according to reporting out of CoinDesk .
Even clients of JPMorgan Chase and Fidelity, including myself, encounter a risk disclosure pop-up when placing an order. On the financial adviser front, barriers still exist. I've received messages from numerous individuals stating that their advisors are either unwilling to provide exposure to bitcoin ETFs or are entirely opposed to adding such exposure. This shouldn't be too surprising, given that such a product wasn't even on their radar, according to data compiled by issuer Bitwise. In fact, less than half of advisors anticipated an ETF in 2024. Even when they are ready to offer exposure, they are going to have to put in the work of reworking their portfolio mythologies, secure approvals from management, etc. These are months-long processes, not weeks long.
Let's celebrate the approval for the meaning, but realize that much of the hard work has only just begun.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
Deutsche Bank: The "fifth wave of tech stock rally" in US stocks since late July has peaked, prepare for a "V-shaped reversal"
Deutsche Bank has downgraded its rating on US technology stocks from overweight to neutral, noting that the fifth round of tech stock rally since July 29 is approaching the upper boundary of the long-term trend channel. The current upside potential is only about 4 percentage points, while historical trends indicate downside risks could reach 16 percentage points. Funds are expected to rotate into other sectors, and the European market, with its lower tech exposure, is likely to benefit relatively. However, Deutsche Bank emphasized that the long-term outperformance trend of technology stocks remains unchanged.
How expensive is AI computing power rental in the US? "Spot price" is twice that of long-term contracts, and four times the return threshold for cloud service providers.
The short-term spot leasing price for AI computing power reaches as high as $40 to $50 billion per gigawatt per year, while the price for long-term contracts is only $20 billion per year, and the breakeven threshold for supercomputing cloud operators is around $12 billion per year. However, according to Goldman Sachs, the fundamental reason why hyperscale cloud providers like Google rent computing power at such significant premiums is that their in-house capacity cannot keep up; once their own capacity catches up, the spot premium will disappear.
‘More bullish on Bitcoin’ – Strategy leads 91% of corporate BTC buying
Crypto prices
More
